| Sysop: | KK4QBN |
|---|---|
| Location: | Chatsworth, GA |
| Users: | 22 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 23:46:30 |
| Calls: | 1,220 |
| Calls today: | 0 |
| Files: | 94,829 |
| U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
115 files (131M bytes) |
| Messages: | 30,449 |
| Posted today: | 0 |
Trump gas = $1.80/gal
Biden gas = $3.60/gal
These are facts? No they are not. I paid more than $3.60 of gas durin Trump administration when COVID hit.
No you didn't! even with Covid under Trump it never reached $3.00.
You do remember that COVID hit under
Trump's term right? You do realize all the problems Trump caused make Biden look bad because Trump's policies didn't actually really start taking effect until after Biden was in office.
Lol, NO! Biden caused his own problems by reversing everything Trump did f the ecconomy.
These are facts? No they are not. I paid more than $3.60 of gas
durin Trump administration when COVID hit.
No you didn't! even with Covid under Trump it never reached $3.00.
Ah yes, because you know more about Neofree's lived experience than Neofree themself.
Lol, NO! Biden caused his own problems by reversing everything Trump
did f the ecconomy.
False. Trump's tax cuts disproportionately negatively affected the lower & middle class, with the bottom 60 percent of households receiving an average tax cut of $500 in 2025 under them, compared to more than $60k for the top 1 percent. His tax cuts, on top of Bush's from 2001 and 2003 (most of which were made permanent in 2012), have eroded the US' revenue base from 19.5% of GDP at the turn of the XXI c. to 16.3% in the years immediately following them.
The Democratic Party is center to center-right by the standards of the rest of the developed world.
False. Trump's tax cuts disproportionately negatively affected the lower & middle class, with the bottom 60 percent of households receiving an average tax cut of $500 in 2025 under them, compared to more than $60k for the top 1 percent. His tax cuts, on top of Bush's from 2001 and 2003 (most of which were made permanent in 2012), have eroded the US' revenue base from 19.5% of GDP at the turn of the XXI c. to 16.3% in the years immediately following them.
I think a classical conservative would consider that effect a success. I'd rather have the population administrate that 3.2% difference of the GDP than a
government known not to represent the will of the people (and yes, there is some study that shows the federal government is consistently bad at taking actions the population wants, which is very bad when you consider the government is supposed to represent the will of the people).
Also, if you live in the real world, trickle down is totally a thing. It is no
as beautiful as politicians paint it, but I can guarantee you it is much easie
to make a living selling stuff as a minorist when people with more money than you have more disposable income.